Hi HQ, I just realized that you have archived a lot of the historical posts (you mentioned this before that this will happen). Does that mean there is no access to those older posts anymore?
I was picking up things from backward (starting with the earliest posts) and some of the posts talked about interesting topics and shares good quant papers, would be a bit of a bummer if we lose all those info (I do want to absorb as much as I can). Let me know your thought.
Hi Chris, likely we will reiterate some of the more salient points and compile them into the Market Notes instead.
It is likely we would not feature the same article again. Apologies for the inconvenience. If there is a particular topic of interest, do let us know and we will consider elaborating in the future.
Hello HQ, I support Chris request, I'm also working things backwards as I'm novice to the field and would like to catch up on what you already wrote before diving into your recent work (which seems more complex but I have no doubt that by reading things in order, everything will eventually make sense).
Unfortunately I'm learning about the "one year content" policy, and I find it odd, I can't figure why you would hinder the progression of this substack by removing some older and more basic content.
I found you on twitter and only now notice these tweets :
I'm really just quoting your words : "We also have a lot of people DM-ing to ask if there are posts describing the foundational concepts, which we used to have but archived since they are older than a year…"
Care to reconsider ? It would be much more welcoming for newcomers if the old & basic posts were back. Thanks
Hi HQ, I just realized that you have archived a lot of the historical posts (you mentioned this before that this will happen). Does that mean there is no access to those older posts anymore?
I was picking up things from backward (starting with the earliest posts) and some of the posts talked about interesting topics and shares good quant papers, would be a bit of a bummer if we lose all those info (I do want to absorb as much as I can). Let me know your thought.
Thanks.
Hi Chris, likely we will reiterate some of the more salient points and compile them into the Market Notes instead.
It is likely we would not feature the same article again. Apologies for the inconvenience. If there is a particular topic of interest, do let us know and we will consider elaborating in the future.
Hello HQ, I support Chris request, I'm also working things backwards as I'm novice to the field and would like to catch up on what you already wrote before diving into your recent work (which seems more complex but I have no doubt that by reading things in order, everything will eventually make sense).
Unfortunately I'm learning about the "one year content" policy, and I find it odd, I can't figure why you would hinder the progression of this substack by removing some older and more basic content.
I found you on twitter and only now notice these tweets :
https://twitter.com/HangukQuant/status/1684614013785944064
https://twitter.com/HangukQuant/status/1684614390375698432
I'm really just quoting your words : "We also have a lot of people DM-ing to ask if there are posts describing the foundational concepts, which we used to have but archived since they are older than a year…"
Care to reconsider ? It would be much more welcoming for newcomers if the old & basic posts were back. Thanks
the old posts will not be reinstated, but we are going to go from the basics again all the way up to where we are right now starting from next week.